Surely the purpose is obvious - the clue is in the name - the vomitorium must have been the place where Romans went to purge themselves of whatever excess (food or drink) they had indulged in? Well, no.
The idea of inducing vomiting and quick trips to the ‘vomitorium’ is a modern misinterpretation attributed by the Oxford English Dictionary to Aldus Huxley in 1923, but it may an even earlier 19th century origin [1]. Cultured Romans entirely disapproved of excessive food and drink consumption. Indeed, public drunkenness was considered a sign of weakness and could lead to social disgrace. Yet, after a meal, if you were feeling unwell, whether from overeating, drinking or otherwise, it was considered wise to use an emetic - something to induce vomiting. To the Romans it seemed silly to remain feeling sick, especially if you could have been ‘inadvertently’ poisoned!
Vomitoria did exist, however. The term was first used by the Roman writer Macrobius in the 5th century AD. In his ‘Saturnalia’, he describes how crowds of people would ‘spew forth’ through the passages inside public venues. In other words, they were the means by which audiences could enter or leave places like amphitheatres, circuses or theatres. The Amphitheatrum Flavium (the ‘Flavian Amphitheatre or, more popularly, the ‘Colosseum’) in Rome, for example, had 80 vomitoria, 76 of which were for the general public, plus four Grand Entrances for Rome’s elite citizens. The arches one can still see today gave admission to corridors that ran around the building that gave access to the staircases and passages leading to the building’s seats. These passages were called vomitoria and were situated below or behind the tiers of seats in the amphitheatre. It was boasted that, at the end of a performance, the Colosseum could be emptied in just 15 minutes. Our notion, therefore, of vomiting comes from the Roman crowds literally ‘spewing forth’ from the exits.
Reference:
Malik, S., (2023), ‘Q&A’, BBC History magazine April 2023 edition, p. 32.
Endnotes:
1. In the 19th century writers and journalists spread the misconception because it fitted with their notions of excessive Romans that resided, and still do, in the public imagination.
No comments:
Post a Comment