In April 2005 David Sapsted,
writing for The Telegraph newspaper, reported that: “Years of division among
academics over whether the Romans or the Normans introduced rabbits into
Britain appears to have been resolved.” Many
people, myself included, had believed for a long time that the Normans
introduced rabbits for their meat and fur.
In 2005, however, an archaeological dig at Lynford, near Thetford in
Norfolk uncovered the skeletal remains of a rabbit that was dated to the first
or second century AD by the pottery fragments found beside it. Some of the pottery fragments included
domestic pots that could have been used for cooking, and the bones showed signs
of having been butchered. The evidence
seemed to prove that rabbits had been brought to these shores by the Romans and
vindicated Marcus Terrentius Varro’s (116-27 BC) account that the legions had
introduced rabbits from Spain, where they had been reared in walled enclosures
and served as a gourmet dish.
Although described by Pliny the Elder in his Naturalis Historia in the first century AD, it was the earlier writer and historian Polybius who first described the European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) at about the time ancient Greece fell under the sway of the Romans in the second century BC (Polybius, Histories XII.3.1):
"ho de kuniklos porrôthen
men horômenos einai dokei lagôs mikros, hotan d' eis tas cheiras labêi tis, megalên echei
diaphoran kai kata tên epiphaneian kai kata tên brôsin:
The rabbit indeed at a distance
looks like a small hare; but when taken in the hand,
it is found to be widely different both in appearance and in the taste of its
flesh; and it also lives generally underground.”
For the Romans their tastes for rabbit developed during their conquest and occupation of Hispania, modern Spain. Here the Romans quickly acquired a taste for "laurices". The term laurices is the plural of the Latin word laurex (variant laurix, n. masc., pl. laurices) and refers to the foetus of the rabbit prepared without evisceration and consumed as a table delicacy.bbThe Romans are known to have raised rabbits in stone walled or tiled pens, probably to facilitate the harvesting of laurices, but the industry apparently collapsed as the Roman Empire fell.
The European or common rabbit is native to south-western Europe
(Spain and Portugal) and northwest Africa (Morocco and Algeria), both areas being
firmly within the boundary of the Roman Empire.
Thus the Roman connection makes sense.
Surprisingly, however, there is evidence for rabbits living in Britain
long before the Romans set foot on British soil. Remains of hares and a rabbit's tooth dating
back half a million years were found in excavations at Boxgrove in West Sussex
and Swanscombe in Kent. Yet in the
intervening almost 500,000 years between the Boxgrove and Swanscombe and the
Roman period there is no evidence of rabbits existing in Britain. So what happened? The most likely explanation is that rabbits died
out in the last Ice Age only to be re-introduced by the Romans.
Even though the Romans imported domesticated rabbits from
Iberia, there is scant evidence that any Roman rabbits escaped to the
countryside and established themselves in Britain. And as for the Normans, there is apparently no
mention of the rabbit in the Domesday Book commissioned by William I (the
Conqueror) in AD 1068. So, if they are
missing from post-Roman Britain, where did today’s rabbits come from?
The first Medieval references to the European rabbit in the
British Isles noted that they were kept on the Scilly Isles, Lundy Island (in
the Bristol Channel) and the Isle of Wight in the 12th and 13th century. These offshore locations may have protected
rabbits from predators and provided lighter soils for burrowing. Rabbit remains were found in the excavation of
a midden at Rayleigh Castle in Essex; it is possible that the rabbits may have
come from islands off the Essex Coast, for example Foulness. As for the mainland, definite records exist
from about AD 1235 revealing that King Henry III had rabbits in a royal park at
Guildford, Surrey. Maintained rabbit
colonies were known as cuningera or coneygarths, and written accounts indicate
Henry ordered the sheriffs and bishops of various cities to supply the Court
with rabbits from their coneygarths. It was
about this time that rabbit began to appear on banquet menus. For example, it is recorded in AD 1251 that
Henry III and his court ate some 450 rabbits as part of their Christmas feast.
Since then our relationship with the rabbit has continued to
evolve. Domesticated rabbits have mostly
been bred to be much larger than wild rabbits, and selective
breeding has produced a wide range of breeds to be kept as pets and food
animals across the world. Rabbit fur is
still prized for its softness and the likes of Angora rabbits are
raised for their long, soft fur, which can be spun into yarn. So, domesticated rabbits were probably re-introduced
to Britain by the Romans and then again during the Middle Ages,
and over time they have been refined into the wide variety of breeds familiar
to us today.